A Layered Deformable Model for Gait Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a layered deformable model (LDM) is proposed for human body pose recovery in gait analysis. This model is inspired by the manually labeled silhouettes in (Z. Liu, et al., July 2004) and it is designed to closely match them. For fronto-parallel gait, the introduced LDM model defines the body part widths and lengths, the position and the joint angles of human body using 22 parameters. The model consists of four layers and allows for limb deformation. With this model, our objective is to recover its parameters (and thus the human body pose) from automatically extracted silhouettes. LDM recovery algorithm is first developed for manual silhouettes, in order to generate ground truth sequences for comparison and useful statistics regarding the LDM parameters. It is then extended for automatically extracted silhouettes. The proposed methodologies have been tested on 10005 frames from 285 gait sequences captured under various conditions and an average error rate of 7% is achieved for the lower limb joint angles of all the frames, showing great potential for model-based gait recognition
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".