Influence of igneous sills on Paleocene turbidite deposition in the Faroe–Shetland Basin: a case study in Flett and Muckle sub-basin and its implication for hydrocarbon exploration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new interpretation on three-dimensional seismic data from the Flett and Muckle sub-basins of the Faroe–Shetland Basin has shown dyke and sill emplacement influencing the Paleocene turbidite deposition. Sill and dyke emplacement in the study area created significant inflation anticlines during Paleocene time and affected palaeotopography at the seafloor. The uplift of older Early Paleocene (Sullom) and Middle Paleocene (early Vaila) turbidite deposits results in their erosion and redeposition in adjacent lows or transports them further into the basin by erosive channels. By using public domain well and biostratigraphic data from wells 208/19-1, 206/2a-1 and 206/1-2, seismic data and the use of seismic sequence stratigraphy to map the onlapping seismic reflectors on the flanks of the inflated anticlines, the relative timing of sill emplacement in the study area is shown to be Early–Middle Paleocene. The ability to identify these systems and understand the interaction between palaeotopography and Paleocene turbidite deposition in the basin is key to unlocking the hydrocarbon potential in the UK flank of the Faroe–Shetland Basin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".