Expulsion of Secondary <i>Trichinella spiralis</i> Infection in Rats Occurs Independently of Mucosal Mast Cell Release of Mast Cell Protease II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our aim was to elucidate the contribution of mucosal mast cells to the effector phase of a secondary immune response to Trichinella spiralis. During secondary infection, rats expel 90-99% of T. spiralis first-stage larvae from the intestine in a matter of hours. This phenomenon appears to be unique to rats and has been called rapid expulsion. Primary intestinal infection by T. spiralis induces mastocytosis, and mast cell degranulation occurs when challenged rats exhibit rapid expulsion. These observations have engendered the view that mast cells mediate rapid expulsion. In this study, we report that immunization of adult Albino Oxford rats by an infection limited to the muscle phase did not induce intestinal mastocytosis, yet such rats exhibited rapid expulsion when challenged orally. Although mastocytosis was absent, the protease unique to mucosal mast cells, rat mast cell protease II (RMCPII), was detected in sera at the time of expulsion. We further evaluated mast cell activity in neonatal rats that display rapid expulsion. Pups born to infected dams displayed rapid expulsion, and RMCPII was detected in their sera. By feeding pups parasite-specific mAbs or polyclonal Abs before challenge infection, it was possible to dissociate mast cell degranulation from parasite expulsion. These results indicate that rapid expulsion can occur in the absence of either intestinal mastocytosis or RMCPII release. Furthermore, release of RMCPII is not sufficient to cause expulsion. The data argue against a role for mast cells in the mechanism underlying the effector phase of protective immunity against T. spiralis in rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".