<i>Graffenrieda emarginata</i> (Melastomataceae) forms mycorrhizas with Glomeromycota and with a member of the <i>Hymenoscyphus ericae</i> aggregate in the organic soil of a neotropical mountain rain forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graffenrieda emarginata (Ruiz & Pav.) Triana (Melastomataceae) was found to be the most frequent tree on the nutrient-poor organic soil in a species-rich tropical mountain rain forest of southern Ecuador. Our studies revealed that the rootlets are symbiotically associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and simultaneously form ectomy corrhizas displaying a superficial Hartig net but no hyphal mantle. Molecular phylogeny revealed a multitude of previously unknown glomeromycete sequence types. Ultrastructure of the ectomycorrhiza-forming fungus indicated an ascomycete, and molecular phylogenetic studies identified the fungal symbiont as a new taxon within the Hymenoscy phus ericae (Read) Korf & Kernan aggregate (Ascomycota). The mycorrhizal state of G. emarginata is considered crucial for its competitiveness and abundance in these sites.Key words: arbuscular mycorrhiza, ectomycorrhiza, Glomeromycota, Hymenoscyphus ericae aggregate, neotropical mountain rain forest, Ecuador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".