MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110065346

The effect of intralesional meglumine antimoniate (glucantime) versus a combination of 50% topical trichloroacetic acid and local heat therapyby non-ablative radiofrequency on cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions

2012· article· en· W2110065346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh, Farahnaz Fatemi Naeeni, Narges Sattar, Elaheh Haftbaradaran, Fariba Jaffary, Gholamreza Askari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research in Medical Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCutaneous leishmaniasisMeglumine antimoniateLeishmaniasisDermatologyTraditional medicineFamily medicinePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh, Farahnaz Fatemi Naeeni, Narges Sattar, Elaheh Haftbaradaran, Fariba Jaffary, Gholamreza Askari 1 Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran And Skin Disease and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 2 Skin Disease and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 3 Skin Disease and Leishmaniasis Research Center And Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran And Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada. 4 Skin Disease and Leishmaniasis Research Center And School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research in Medical SciencesSame topicResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesFrench-language works237,207