An Analysis of Compositional Variations and Spatial Relationships within Fe-Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposits on the North Range of the Sudbury Igneous Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analytical data sets provided for mineral exploration borehole samples from the McCreedy West mine and other orebodies along the North Range of the Sudbury Igneous Complex have been examined in a series of atomic ratio diagrams designed in order to elucidate the mass transfer processes involved in their genesis. The compositions of ores from the McCreedy West mine display a strongly bimodal distribution. A Cu-poor population (1), largely located along the footwall contact, displays trends consistent with fractionation dominated by pyrrhotite (monosulfide solid solution) crystallization. A Cu-rich population (2), located within the footwall vein system, displays trends consistent with fractionation dominated by chalcopyrite (intermediate solid solution) crystallization. What appears to be a shared trend between the two populations suggests that they are related by derivation from a cognate pair of immiscible sulfide liquids. The compositions of ores for all deposits examined within the Levack embayment on the North Range of the Sudbury Igneous Complex collectively show the same compositional bimodality that is observed at McCreedy West. Compositional relationships displayed by these deposits, individually and collectively, are consistent with the separation of an immiscible, Cu-rich melt during cooling and fractionation of monosulfide solid solution from a less Cu-rich, parental sulfide liquid. The spatial relationships of the two ore populations at McCreedy West and within the Levack embayment suggest that density relations and volume changes associated with the unmixing and crystallization processes have played a major role in the emplacement of footwall orebodies. Spatial relationships of the two ore populations suggest that the various orebodies within the Levack embayment were all emplaced when the basal contact of the Sudbury Igneous Complex was essentially horizontal and that they represent different parts of a cogenetic system emplaced penecontemporaneously within arcuate, upwardly concave, dilational fractures associated with uplift and brecciation of the footwall and local collapse of the hanging-wall rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".