Stress-overcoming behaviour of women with minor cardiac abnormalities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normal 0 false false false RU X-NONE X-NONE The purpose of this research was to determine stress-overcoming behaviour of women with minor cardiac abnormalities considering abnormality intensity. With the help of Toronto Alexithymia Scale, E. Heim`s system and S. Subbotin`s test 122 young women with different manifestation rates of the heart connective tissue dysplasia (minimal – basic group and moderate - comparison group) were examine d (average age –21,46 ± 2,12 years). Significant dominance of adaptive coping strategies in all spheres was revealed when studying of stress-overcoming behaviour of healthy women with minor cardiac abnormalities of minimal intensity. Women of the comparison group used maladaptive coping-strategies in emotional and behavioural spheres more often comparing with clinically healthy women of the basic group. Significantly lower level of the stress resistance and higher alexithymia level were determined in the observed group with minor cardiac abnormalities of moderate intensity which has chosen maladaptive emotional and behavioural coping-strategies. The results are appropriate to consider for personalized arrangements for prevention of cardiovascular complications in patients with heart connective tissue dysplasia syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".