Magnetic Resonance In Situ Study of Tricalcium Aluminate Hydration in the Presence of Gypsum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hydration of tricalcium aluminate, in the presence of gypsum, is investigated using in situ “real‐time” 1 H NMR spin–spin relaxation, X‐ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscope experiments. Aside from rapid ettringite formation within the first 45 min, it is shown that a re‐distribution of water within the first 2 h contributes significantly to the retardation of the rate of hydration. From the 1 H NMR component with T 2 of approximately 20 μs, the continual disappearance of ettringite and the production of the layered monosulfate structure is monitored. In addition, the technique makes possible the monitoring of the change in the quantity of interlayer water in monosulfate, as well as the time scale associated with the decrease in the effective interlayer spacing, resulting from the ionic substitution of SO 4 2− for OH − . The ionic substitution within monosulfate starts after approximately 9 h. Although it has been believed that the time scale for this reaction is fast, we have shown that it can take days to reach completion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".