Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death among patients with end-stage renal disease, accounting for almost half of all fatalities. In recent years much progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in the uraemic population. Anaemia is a consistent finding in chronic renal disease, affecting up to 90% of patients, and the central role of anaemia in the development of cardiovascular dysfunction is now well established. A significant proportion of patients have established cardiovascular complications on initiation of dialysis, raising the possibility of early correction of anaemia as a strategy for preventing cardiovascular co-morbidities among renal patients. Randomized, controlled trials have shown that normalization of haemoglobin (Hb) with recombinant erythropoietin (rh-Epo) is of no cardiovascular benefit in haemodialysis patients with symptomatic heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, or severe left ventricular dilatation, although suggestive evidence exists for benefits at earlier stages of cardiac disease. Results from large-scale clinical trials are required to clarify the effects of early anaemia correction on mortality and cardiovascular function, as well as appropriate treatment targets in different patient populations. The potential exists for higher Hb levels to extend patient survival through cardioprotective effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".