MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110187158 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.211417

Combined X-ray, NMR, and Kinetic Analyses Reveal Uncommon Binding Characteristics of the Hepatitis C Virus NS3-NS4A Protease Inhibitor BI 201335

2011· article· en· W2110187158 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher T. Lemke, Nathalie Goudreau, Songping Zhao, Oliver Hucke, Diane Thibeault, Montse Llinàs‐Brunet, Peter W. White

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNS3ProteaseActive siteHepatitis C virusVirologyChemistryVirusBiologyStereochemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatitis C virus infection, a major cause of liver disease worldwide, is curable, but currently approved therapies have suboptimal efficacy. Supplementing these therapies with direct-acting antiviral agents has the potential to considerably improve treatment prospects for hepatitis C virus-infected patients. The critical role played by the viral NS3 protease makes it an attractive target, and despite its shallow, solvent-exposed active site, several potent NS3 protease inhibitors are currently in the clinic. BI 201335, which is progressing through Phase IIb trials, contains a unique C-terminal carboxylic acid that binds noncovalently to the active site and a bromo-quinoline substitution on its proline residue that provides significant potency. In this work we have used stopped flow kinetics, x-ray crystallography, and NMR to characterize these distinctive features. Key findings include: slow association and dissociation rates within a single-step binding mechanism; the critical involvement of water molecules in acid binding; and protein side chain rearrangements, a bromine-oxygen halogen bond, and profound pK(a) changes within the catalytic triad associated with binding of the bromo-quinoline moiety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207