Proinflammatory Gene Induction by Platelet-Activating Factor Mediated Via Its Cognate Nuclear Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been postulated that intracellular binding sites for platelet-activating factor (PAF) contribute to proinflammatory responses to PAF. Isolated nuclei from porcine cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (PCECs) produced PAF-molecular species in response to H(2)O(2). Using FACS analysis, we demonstrated the expression of PAF receptors on cell and nuclear surfaces of PCECs. Confocal microscopy studies performed on PCECs, Chinese hamster ovary cells stably overexpressing PAF receptors, and isolated nuclei from PCECs also showed a robust nuclear distribution of PAF receptors. Presence of PAF receptors at the cell nucleus was further revealed in brain endothelial cells by radioligand binding experiments, immunoblotting, and in situ in brain by immunoelectron microscopy. Stimulation of nuclei with methylcarbamate-PAF evoked a decrease in cAMP production and a pertussis toxin-sensitive rise in nuclear calcium, unlike observations in plasma membrane, which exhibited a pertussis toxin-insensitive elevation in inositol phosphates. Moreover, on isolated nuclei methylcarbamate-PAF evoked the expression of proinflammatory genes inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and was associated with augmented extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation and NF-kappaB binding to the DNA consensus sequence. COX-2 expression was prevented by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and NF-kappaB inhibitors. This study describes for the first time the nucleus as a putative organelle capable of generating PAF and expresses its receptor, which upon stimulation induces the expression of the proinflammatory gene COX-2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".