Redox Intermediates in the Catalase Cycle of Catalase-Peroxidases from <i>Synechocystis</i> PCC 6803<i>, Burkholderia pseudomallei</i>, and <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monofunctional catalases (EC 1.11.1.6) and catalase-peroxidases (KatGs, EC 1.11.1.7) have neither sequence nor structural homology, but both catalyze the dismutation of hydrogen peroxide (2H2O2 --> 2H2O + O2). In monofunctional catalases, the catalatic mechanism is well-characterized with conventional compound I [oxoiron(IV) porphyrin pi-cation radical intermediate] being responsible for hydrogen peroxide oxidation. The reaction pathway in KatGs is not as clearly defined, and a comprehensive rapid kinetic and spectral analysis of the reactions of KatGs from three different sources (Synechocystis PCC 6803, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis) with peroxoacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide has focused on the pathway. Independent of KatG, but dependent on pH, two low-spin forms dominated in the catalase cycle with absorbance maxima at 415, 545, and 580 nm at low pH and 418 and 520 nm at high pH. By contrast, oxidation of KatGs with peroxoacetic acid resulted in intermediates with different spectral features that also differed among the three KatGs. Following the rate of H2O2 degradation by stopped-flow allowed the linking of reaction intermediate species with substrate availability to confirm which species were actually present during the catalase cycle. Possible reaction intermediates involved in H2O2 dismutation by KatG are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it