Association of rapamycin and co-stimulation blockade using anti-B7 antibodies in renal allotransplantation in baboons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Co-stimulation blockade has already been shown to induce transplantation tolerance in rodents, but until now has failed in large animal models. We therefore sought to investigate whether the addition of rapamycin to a co-stimulation blockade regimen could induce tolerance in baboon recipients of a renal allograft and to characterize the immunological characteristics of rejection. METHODS: Two baboons were used for a pharmacological and toxicological analysis and received anti-B7.1 and anti-B7 antibodies every other day for 60 days. Three groups of baboons underwent classical heterotopic renal allotransplantation; the first group received no treatment (control group; n = 2), the second received a combination of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (B7 group; n = 4), and the third received the anti-B7 antibody treatment as above with an additional treatment of rapamycin (B7-Rapa; n = 4). Graft survival as well as immunological analyses were performed. RESULTS: Anti-B7 mAb monotherapy prolonged allograft survival in three out of four of the animals, one of whom survived rejection free for 87 days but died from a pulmonary embolism; the fourth animal died without rejection. The addition of rapamycin to the regimen did not prolong survival further; three of the four animals underwent early rejection whereas the fourth survived long term but eventually rejected at day 114. Whereas alloimmunization only occurred in this latter animal, rejection was always characterized by a substantial lymphocyte and monocyte infiltration, associated with a strong pro-inflammatory/cytotoxic mRNA accumulation in the anti-B7-treated animals, but to a lesser extent in the B7-Rapa group. T cells extracted and cloned from a biopsy taken at a stable post-transplant time showed a lower frequency of anti-donor alloreactivity in vitro than those extracted from a rejected tissue. Nevertheless, these non-responding clones failed to show regulatory activity in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: We thus confirm that blocking the CD28/B7 pathway by anti-B7 mAbs could prolong graft survival in baboons, but the addition of rapamycin was insufficient to induce tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".