Integrating depositional models, ichnology, and sequence stratigraphy in reservoir characterization: The middle member of the Devonian–Carboniferous Bakken Formation of subsurface southeastern Saskatchewan revisited
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous Bakken Formation is a widespread siliciclastic unit in the subsurface of the Williston Basin that is subdivided into three members: lower and upper organic-rich shale members and a dolomitic, silty, and sandy middle member. Although the unit has become one of the most active oil plays in North America and numerous sedimentologic studies have been made, no consensus about the depositional environments of the middle member has been achieved. Previous studies suggested several depositional and sequence-stratigraphic scenarios, including lowstand offshore-shoreface, normal-regressive offshore-shoreface, incised estuary, and falling-stage shoreface complexes for the middle member. We propose a new depositional and sequence-stratigraphic model and compare it with some previous interpretations. This new model includes a basal transgressive systems tract (TST) embracing shelf deposits, a highstand systems tract comprising shelf to lower shoreface environments, and an upper TST encompassing a brackish-water embayment complex and offshore to shelf settings. Petrophysical characterization of the sedimentary facies reveals that bay-mouth cross-stratified fine-grained sandstone, flaser-bedded very fine grained sandstone formed in wave-dominated tidal flats, offshore-transition highly bioturbated interbedded very fine grained sandstone and siltstone, and tidal-flat very fine grained sandstone with common mud drapes possess the best reservoir qualities. Recognition of a restricted embayment within the Bakken middle member has major implications for both exploration and production. Embayment facies with good reservoir quality constitute good oil prospects in localized areas, whereas fully marine facies may represent good oil prospects of more regional extent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".