MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110348228 · doi:10.1139/p04-041

Relativistic many-body calculations of energies for doubly-excited 1<i>s</i>2<i>l</i>2<i>l</i>′ and 1<i>s</i>3<i>l</i>3<i>l</i>′ states in Li-like ions

2004· article· en· W2110348228 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. S. Safronova

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Nuclear Security Administration
KeywordsPhysicsPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)CoulombAtomic physicsExcited stateIonLamb shiftOrder (exchange)ElectronQuantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energies of 1s2l2l′ and 1s3l3l′ states for Li-like ions with Z = 6–100 are evaluated to second order in relativistic many-body perturbation theory. Second-order Coulomb and Breit–Coulomb interactions are included. The calculations start with a Dirac potential and include all possible 1s2l2l′ and 1s3l3l′ configurations. Correction for the frequency dependence of the Breit interaction is taken into account in lowest order. The Lamb-shift correction to the energies is also included in lowest order. A detailed discussion of the various contributions to the energy levels is given for Li-like iron (Z = 26). We found that the three-electron corrections to the energy contribute about 10–20% of the total second-order energy. Comparisons are made with available experimental data and excellent agreement for term splitting is obtained even for low-Z ions. These calculations are presented as a theoretical benchmark for comparison with experiment and theory.PACS Nos.: 32.30.Rj, 32.70.Cs, 31.25.Jf, 31.15.Md

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207