MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging

2003· review· en· W2110385382 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Phytologist · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoggingClearcuttingCoarse woody debrisRegeneration (biology)FellingBiologyAgroforestryEcologyEnvironmental scienceHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community of clearcut logging, which is used to harvest millions of hectares of ectomycorrhizal forest annually, has been studied for a number of years. Here, we review current knowledge of inoculum sources for ectomycorrhizal fungi in forests and then re-examine earlier studies of ectomycorrhizas on young trees in regenerating stands. We conclude that, taken separately from the effects of site preparation, the major impact of clearcut logging is to change the species composition of the ectomycorrhizal fungal community rather than to reduce the percentage of roots colonized. A thorough examination of site preparation treatments suggests that the changes in fungal species composition are driven by changes in the biology and chemistry of the soil environment after clearcutting as much as they are by loss or change in fungal inoculum. This is an important conclusion because it implies that these new ectomycorrhizal fungal communities are better adapted to the new conditions than the ones in the forest would have been. The shift in fungal species composition and diversity will have implications for seedling establishment and competition. The effects of individual fungi or diverse assemblages of fungi on seedling growth, and effects of changes in the ability of young trees to associate with a common mycelium are discussed. Contents Summary 399 I. Introduction 400 II. Population biology and inoculum potential of ectomycorrhizal fungi 401 III. Ectomycorrhiza development on seedlings regenerating after clearcut logging 402 IV. Which is the most important factor driving changes in the ECM fungal community after clearcut logging: inoculum loss or change in the below-ground environment? 406 V. Possible consequences for regenerating stands of species shifts in ectomycorrhizal fungi 414 VI. Conclusions 416.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it