MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110403348 · doi:10.1242/jeb.00672

Catecholamine secretion in trout chromaffin cells experiencing nicotinic receptor desensitization is maintained by non-cholinergic neurotransmission

2003· article· en· W2110403348 on OpenAlexaff
Brian McNeill, Colin J. Montpetit, Steve F. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHexamethoniumEndocrinologyInternal medicineNicotinic agonistCatecholamineGanglion type nicotinic receptorChromaffin cellCholinergicAlpha-4 beta-2 nicotinic receptorStimulationBiologyReceptorMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorChemistryNicotinic acetylcholine receptorAdrenal medullaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of the present study was to assess the catecholamine secretory capabilities of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss chromaffin cells experiencing desensitization of the nicotinic receptor. It was hypothesized that the potential to secrete catecholamines could be maintained under conditions of nicotinic receptor desensitization owing to activation of non-cholinergic release pathways. An in situ model for chromaffin cell nicotinic receptor desensitization was developed by perfusing a posterior cardinal vein preparation with saline containing 10(-5) mol l(-1) nicotine. Under such conditions of desensitization, the chromaffin cells were largely unresponsive to high-frequency (20 Hz) electrical stimulation; the minimal remaining secretory response was abolished by addition of the nicotinic receptor antagonist hexamethonium (10(-3) mol l(-1)). In marked contrast, however, the capacity to secrete catecholamines in response to low-frequency (1 Hz) electrical stimulation was unaffected by nicotinic receptor desensitization or by cholinergic receptor blockade (hexamethonium plus atropine). In preparations experiencing nicotinic receptor desensitization, the stimulatory effect of low-frequency (1 Hz) stimulation on catecholamine secretion was reduced by 43% in the presence of the VPAC receptor antagonist, VIP(6-28). The stimulatory effect of high-frequency (20 Hz) stimulation was unaffected by VIP(6-28). Catecholamine secretion evoked by cod VIP (10(-11) mol kg(-1)) and homologous angiotensin II ([Asn(1), Val(5)] Ang II; 5 x 10(-7) mol kg(-1)) was markedly enhanced (107 and 97%, respectively) in desensitized preparations. However, the secretory response to the muscarinic receptor agonist methylcholine (1 x 10(-3) mol kg(-1)) was unchanged by desensitization. The results of this study demonstrate that exploitation of non-cholinergic mechanisms, including peptidergic pathways activated during low-frequency neuronal stimulation, is a potential strategy whereby catecholamine secretion from trout chromaffin cells can be maintained during periods of nicotinic receptor desensitization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyFrench-language works237,207