MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110408752 · doi:10.1115/icone21-15249

Response Functions of a Cs2LiYCl6 Scintillator to Neutron and Gamma Radiation

2013· article· en· W2110408752 on OpenAlexaff
Nafisah Khan, R. Machrafi, Vitali Kovaltchouk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorNeutronNeutron detectionNeutron temperaturePhysicsNuclear physicsBonner sphereMonte Carlo methodDetectorNeutron cross sectionOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new scintillator, CLYC, has been investigated for possible use in neutron spectrometry. This sensor provides neutron detection for both thermal and fast neutrons from the reactions 6Li(n,α) and 35Cl(n,p), respectively. This work primarily focuses on the detection of fast neutrons since there is currently no sensor that can accurately and efficiently provide information about their incident neutron energy. Conventional methods of fast neutron detection have been based on utilizing materials that use the elastic scattering process of neutrons on 1H to create recoil protons or by thermalizing and capturing these neutrons at thermal energies. Both approaches have drawbacks and are complex in deriving the energy spectrum through the unfolding process. The CLYC scintillator uses a distinct proton peak, whereby the position on the spectrum is proportional to the energy of the incident neutron. The response function of this detector has been simulated using Monte Carlo N-Particle eXtended code (MCNPX) for gamma-rays and neutrons of different energies. The obtained data has been discussed and analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207