Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes of Disseminated Emmonsiosis: A Retrospective Case Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We describe the geographic distribution, clinical characteristics, and management of patients with disease caused by Emmonsia sp., a novel dimorphic fungal pathogen recently described in South Africa. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective chart review of laboratory-confirmed cases of emmonsiosis diagnosed across South Africa from January 2008 through February 2015. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were diagnosed in 5/9 provinces. Fifty-one patients (94%) were human immunodeficiency virus coinfected (median CD4 count 16 cells/µL [interquartile range, 6-40]). In 12 (24%) of these, antiretroviral therapy had been initiated in the preceding 2 months. All patients had disseminated disease, most commonly involving skin (n = 50/52, 96%) and lung (n = 42/48, 88%). Yeasts were visualized on histopathologic examination of skin (n = 34/37), respiratory tissue (n = 2/4), brain (n = 1/1), liver (n = 1/2), and bone marrow (n = 1/15). Emmonsia sp. was cultured from skin biopsy (n = 20/28), mycobacterial/fungal and aerobic blood culture (n = 15/25 and n = 9/37, respectively), bone marrow (n = 12/14), lung (n = 1/1), lymph node (n = 1/1), and brain (n = 1/1). Twenty-four of 34 patients (71%) treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate, 4/12 (33%) treated with a triazole alone, and none of 8 (0%) who received no antifungals survived. Twenty-six patients (48%) died, half undiagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Disseminated emmonsiosis is more widespread in South Africa and carries a higher case fatality rate than previously appreciated. Cutaneous involvement is near universal, and skin biopsy can be used to diagnose the majority of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".