Changes in Chemoreflex Characteristics Following Acute Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition in Humans a Rest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibition with acetazolamide (ACZ, 10 mg kg(-1) I.V.) on the peripheral and central chemosensitivity and breathing pattern was investigated in four women and three men aged 25 +/- 3 years using a modified version of Read's rebreathing technique. Subjects were exposed to dynamic increases in CO2 in hypoxic and hyperoxic backgrounds during control conditions and following acute CA inhibition. All manoeuvres were repeated twice and averaged for data analysis. The central chemoreflex sensitivities, estimated from the slopes of the ventilatory response to CO2 during hyperoxic rebreathing, increased following acute CA inhibition (control vs. ACZ treatment: 1.87 +/- 0.66 vs. 4.07 +/- 1.03 l x min(-1) (mmHg CO2)(-1), P < 0.05). The increased slope was reflected by an increase in the rate of rise of tidal volume and breathing frequency. Furthermore with ACZ, there was a left-ward shift of the ventilation vs. end-tidal PCO2 curve during hyperoxic hypercapnia but not hypoxic hypercapnia. The peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity was isolated by subtracting the hyperoxic slope (central only) from the hypoxic slope (central and peripheral). Following ACZ administration, the peripheral chemosensitivity was blunted (control vs. ACZ treatment: 3.66 +/- 0.92 vs. 1.33 +/- 0.46 l x min(-1) (mmHg CO2)(-1), P < 0.05). In conclusion, acute CA inhibition enhanced the central chemosensitivity to CO2 but diminished the peripheral chemosensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".