MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110518655 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.398

Uncommon testicular metastasis of a primary neuroendocrine tumour of the lung

2013· article· en· W2110518655 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ingrid L. Birker, J. A. van der Zee, Karin M. Keizer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLungMetastasisAsymptomaticLesionRadiologyPathologyTesticular cancerFluorodeoxyglucosePositron emission tomographyLung cancerCarcinomaCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 52-year-old male presented with an asymptomatic palpable mass of the right testicle. Ultrasound confirmed the presence of a testicular tumour and a hemicastration was performed. None of the testis cancer-related tumour markers were elevated and histological findings revealed a neuroendocrine carcinoma, possibly a metastasis from another primary site. The radiological findings showed a lesion in the lung, and a positron emission tomography (PET)-scan was made. The PET scan revealed an increased fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the pulmonary lesion. It also showed lymphatic and hepatic metastases. The patient had no complaints besides a palpable testicular mass and was diagnosed with a cT1aN3M1b neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lower left field of the lung, stage IV. To our knowledge, the presentation of testicular metastasis of a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung has not been described in the literature. No curative options were available and the patient is being treated with salvage chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207