Preterm rabbit lung tissue mechanics: Maturational changes and effect of antenatal steroids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Describe lung tissue and central airway mechanics using forced oscillation in preterm rabbits at different gestational ages and after maternal administration of betamethasone (BM). METHODS: One hundred twelve fetuses from 54 does were studied. Ventilation was done using a Flexivent (Scireq, Montreal, Canada). Resistance (Rrs), compliance/bodyweight (Crs/bw), Newtonian resistance (Rn), tissue damping (G(L)), and elastance (H(L)) were assessed. Maturational changes were studied in normal controls at days 27-31. The effect of BM (0.05 mg/kg on days 25 and 26) or placebo was studied in preterm fetuses at days 27, 28, and 29. RESULTS: In unmanipulated control fetuses, Rrs decreased and Crs/bw increased with advancing gestation. Rn remained stable while G(L) and H(L) decreased. After day 29 no differences in pulmonary mechanics were observed. At 28 days Rrs and Crs/bw in BM and placebo fetuses were better compared to controls. At 29 days, Crs/bw and Rrs were higher, respectively, lower in control fetuses than BM or placebo exposed pups. CONCLUSION: Maturational changes in preterm rabbits occur mainly up to day 29 of gestation and are largely due to changes in tissue mechanics. Maternal BM injection improves lung mechanics at 28 days but placebo has equal effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".