Exposing GNU Octave Signal Processing Functions as Extensible Markup Language (XML) Web Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The set of industry standards for Extensible Markup Language (XML) Web services, such as SOAP and Web Services Description Language (WSDL), enables Internet-wide, implementation-independent distributed computing. Many modern lower-end devices (e.g., mobile phones) can host relatively lightweight client software for SOAP messaging, but do not have resources for hosting GNU Octave (which requires 65 MB of run-time memory). Our project enables that such devices can use GNU Octave signal processing functions. We are the first who have exposed 74 GNU Octave signal processing functions as Web services. A client submits over the Internet a SOAP request in a HTTP message to the Web service. At the Web service side, Apache Tomcat servelet container accepts this message and extracts SOAP content, Apache Axis analyzes this SOAP content, our Java Web service code invokes our new Java-based Octave API, which in turn invokes GNU Octave that performs numerical calculations. The response passes from Octave, through Octave API, our Java Web service code, Axis, to Tomcat that sends an HTTP message with SOAP reply to the client. Our solutions can be also re-used for exposing any program in GNU Octave (or MATLAB) as a Web service
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".