MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110756138

COMPARATIVE SERUM PHTHALATE CONCENTRATIONS IN FERTILE VERSUS INFERTILE MEN AND WOMEN IN SASKATCHEWAN

2014· article· en· W2110756138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandhya Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhthalateInfertilityDemographyGynecologyMedicineBiologyPregnancyChemistrySociologyGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To determine whether serum phthalate concentrations differ in men and women with infertility compared to those without infertility in Saskatchewan Hypothesis: Serum phthalate concentrations will be greater in men and women with infertility compared to fertile men and women Setting: Patients undergoing assisted reproduction for the treatment of infertility; healthy volunteers recruited from the community Recruitment and sample collection: Infertile couples were recruited prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy for treatment of unexplained infertility (n=15), polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS, n=13), and male factor infertility (n=12); fertile men (n=15) and women (n=15) were recruited using poster advertisements. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture for phthalate analysis. Main outcome measures: Serum phthalates concentrations (ng/mL) Design: Prospective cohort pilot study Methods: In infertile couples, blood samples were collected on the following 3 days of the IVF cycle: early during ovarian stimulation, day of oocyte retrieval and day of embryo transfer. In healthy volunteers, 3 blood samples were collected over a 2 week period. Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was conducted to quantify concentrations of four phthalates: di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP). Phthalate concentrations were compared among the four study groups using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests. Results: Serum DEHP and DEP concentrations did not differ among control, unexplained, PCOS, and male factor infertility groups in both men and women (p>0.05). DBP in women did not differ among study groups (p=0.205). In contrast, DBP was lesser in men with unexplained, PCOS, and male factor infertility compared to controls (p < 0.05). Similarly, DIDP was lesser in women of couples with unexplained, PCOS and male factor infertility groups compared to fertile women (p < 0.05). Less DIDP was detected in men with unexplained and male factor infertility compared to the control group (p < 0.05) Conclusion: Serum phthalate concentrations in serum were lesser or not different in infertility patients undergoing IVF compared to fertile volunteers. These findings do not support the notion that serum phthalate concentrations are associated with human infertility. Further research is needed to determine whether phthalate concentration in blood cells and adipose tissue differ in infertile versus fertile men and women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207