In-Storage-Psychrophilic-Anaerobic-Digestion (ISPAD) process. Part I: Model Development and Calibration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In-Storage-Psychrophilic-Anaerobic-Digestion (ISPAD) is a treatment system applicable to wastewaters stored for over 100 days, such as livestock wastes and municipal sludge. The ISPAD system differs from conventional reactors by being a sequentially fed batch process operating at a temperature fluctuating with ambient. The objective of this study was to develop a mathematical model to simulate the ISPAD process, verify the value of its microbial kinetics, and to simulate the pH evolution of its content along with its methane (CH4) production. Furthermore, the values of the ISPAD microbial kinetics were compared to that of previous years to track for further acclimation to psychrophilic conditions. Simulation of ISPAD was achieved using the Simulink/Matlab software. The model was calibrated using laboratory data obtained from batch experiments using 7-year-old ISPAD inoculum, and glucose as substrate, and where glucose, VFAs and pH changes were monitored along with biogas production. The ISPAD model showed good agreement with the experimental data representing the system behaviour between 4 and 35 ºC. Although microbial activity at 4 °C was much slower than that at 18 and 35 ºC, it showed acclimation to low temperatures. Furthermore, comparison of microbial kinetic values over 3 years of field ISPAD monitoring demonstrated continued population acclimation, especially for the methanogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".