MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporary effects of circulating Amadori products on glomerular filtration properties in the normal mouse

2001· article· en· W2110817868 on OpenAlexaff
Irene Londoño, M Bendayan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Glycation End Products research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearanceRenal functionChemistryGlomerular basement membraneInternal medicineAmadori rearrangementEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusMedicineKidneyBiochemistryGlycationProteinuriaUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have established a preferential glomerular filtration of glycated BSA (gBSA), as well as a facilitated filtration of BSA in the presence of gBSA. We intend to determine whether these modifications are permanent or transitory. gBSA was intravenously injected into anesthetized normal mice and maintained in circulation for 30 min, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h. Five minutes before death, FITC-BSA was injected. On immunocytochemical evaluations, increased glomerular filtration of FITC-BSA was found at all circulating time points. Changes at 24 and 48 h were less pronounced. Glomerular basement membrane (GBM)-to-lumen gBSA labeling ratios were similar at all time points suggesting no accumulation of gBSA in the GBM. Seventy percent of the gBSA was cleared from the circulation and the GBM after 24 h, and 95% after 48 h. This was confirmed in experiments with radiolabeled tracers. These results suggest that the alteration in GBM permeability to BSA in the normal mouse are due to the presence of gBSA and are gradually overcome along with its clearance from circulation. In early diabetes, increasing concentrations of circulating glycated proteins could be responsible for changes in glomerular permselectivity and probably for the alteration in glomerular filtration properties leading to diabetic nephropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal PhysiologySame topicAdvanced Glycation End Products researchFrench-language works237,207