MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110860133

When evidence and common sense collide: resident hours and systems of care.

2013· article· en· W2110860133 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Woollard

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHospital Admissions and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)Common senseService (business)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceMedicineWorld Wide WebData scienceBusinessPolitical scienceLawEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The issue of mandatory limits on the working hours of medical resident trainees calls forth a range of debates. The thoughtful reflections of Drs Lajoie[1][1] ( page 132 ) and Cools-Lartigue[2][2] ( page 133 ) are but one dimension of the effects restrictions on resident service hours have on the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.385
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.759
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3850.759
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0170.014
Science and technology studies0.0060.046
Scholarly communication0.0430.063
Open science0.0070.027
Research integrity0.0270.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicHospital Admissions and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207