Role of cardiac overexpression of ANG II in the regulation of cardiac function and remodeling postmyocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ANG II has a clear role in development of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and dysfunction. It has been difficult, however, to determine whether these actions are direct or consequences of its systemic hemodynamic effects in vivo. To overcome this limitation, we used transgenic mice with cardiac-specific expression of a transgene fusion protein that releases ANG II from cardiomyocytes (Tg-ANG II-cardiac) without involvement of the systemic renin-angiotensin system and tested whether increased cardiac ANG II accelerates remodeling and dysfunction postmyocardial infarction (MI), whereas those mice show no evidence of cardiac hypertrophy under the basal condition. Male 12- to 14-wk-old Tg-ANG II-cardiac mice and their wild-type littermates (WT) were subjected to sham-MI or MI by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery for 8 wk. Cardiac ANG II levels were approximately 10-fold higher in Tg-ANG II-cardiac mice than their WT, whereas ANG II levels in plasma and other tissues did not differ between strains. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were similar between groups with or without MI. In sham-MI, Tg-ANG II-cardiac mice had increased collagen deposition and decreased capillary density. The differences between strains became more pronounced after MI. Although cardiac function was well preserved in the Tg-ANG II-cardiac mice with sham-MI, cardiac remodeling and dysfunction post-MI were more severe than WT. Our results demonstrate that, independent of systemic hemodynamic effects, cardiac ANG II may act locally in the heart, causing interstitial fibrosis in sham-MI and accelerating deterioration of cardiac dysfunction and remodeling post-MI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".