Characteristics of consecutive bursts of Pi2 pulsations observed at the SMALL array: A new implication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consecutive bursts of Pi2 pulsations are examined with magnetic field data obtained by the SMALL array in 1999. With reference to the H -component magnetic bays in the high-latitude magnetograms at CPMN, 10 events consisting of two consecutive Pi2 bursts simultaneously observed by the Beijing (BJI, L = 1.46) and Wuhan (WHN, L = 1.20) stations are identified as associated with substorm onsets. Owing to the same waveform seen by the CPMN and IGPP/LANL arrays, they are the global phenomena. Their occurrences are mostly in the 2100–2300 LT (local time) sector in which the dominant frequencies at WHN are higher than the mean frequency, but those at BJI are lower and close to the frequency of the surface wave at the plasmapause. Moreover, the LT dependence of azimuth and polarization of two consecutive Pi2 bursts at BJI and WHN are analyzed and consistent with the ULF waves theory by Itonaga and Yumoto (1998). GOES 8 and GOES 10 confirm the formation of the substorm current wedge after the onsets of two Pi2 bursts. Thus during substorm onsets, Pi2 pulsations at low latitudes may result from hydromagnetic waves driven by an impulsive source in the magnetotail which could commence in the longitude of 2230 LT and later propagate westward and eastward as well. Low-latitude Pi2 waves near the source site may be affected by several factors as they propagate by the stimulation of a surface wave at the plasmapause, by a localized field line oscillation inside the plasmapause, and by the magnetospheric/plasmaspheric cavity (resonance) mode.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".