Association of toll-like receptor 4 variants and ankylosing spondylitis: a case-control study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Functional single nucleotide polymorphisms within the ectoplasmic domain of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) gene have been shown to result in an endotoxin-hyporesponsive phenotype and aberrant signal transduction for bacterial agonists. TLR4 is in proximity to a genome-wide linkage peak in 9q32-33. Given the proposed function and location of TLR4, we examined the association of 2 functional variants of TLR4 in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in Newfoundland. METHODS: In total, 101 AS patients and 100 ethnically matched controls were genotyped, using the Sequenom MassArray platform, for 2 functional variants in the TLR4 gene: Asp299Gly (A/G polymorphism) and Thr399Ile (C/T polymorphism). RESULTS: The minor allele frequency for the Asp299Gly variant (G) was significantly higher in AS cases compared to controls (7.5% vs 2.6%, respectively; OR 3.10, p = 0.037). The minor allele frequency for the Thr399Ile variant (T) for cases and controls was 7.4% vs 3.0% (OR 2.59, p = 0.071). Haplotype analysis using Haploview noted a higher proportion of GT in the cases (for GT, chi-squared p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Given the functional role of TLR4 variants in the innate immune system, larger studies are now warranted to elucidate the association of TLR4 variants in AS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".