MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110927408 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2005.1594313

Design and optimization of a class of oversampled sigma-delta D/A converters by employing genetic algorithms

2005· article· en· W2110927408 on OpenAlexaff
B. Nowrouzian, J. Pulido-Salcedo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer functionDelta-sigma modulationOversamplingIntegratorCascadeControl theory (sociology)ConvertersNoise shapingAlgorithmNoise (video)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Artificial intelligenceCMOSTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a preceding paper, a genetic algorithm was developed for the design and optimization of higher-order oversampled Sigma-Delta digital-to-analog (D/A) converters having cascade-of-resonators and cascade-of-integrators configurations. This paper is concerned with the genetic-algorithm optimization of the corresponding combined cascade-of-resonators/cascade-of-integrators (CRI) Sigma-Delta D/A converters. The salient feature of CRI Sigma-Delta D/A converters is that the constituent signal and noise transfer functions become complimentary by the converter configuration proper, simplifying the design process to the realization of the constituent noise transfer function. Moreover, the configuration proper places the noise transfer function zeros on the unit-circle, making it possible to obtain high signal-to-quantization-noise ratios. The underlying genetic algorithm for the optimization of the noise transfer function guarantees that after the application of the operations of crossover and mutation to the parent noise transfer functions, the resulting offspring noise transfer functions are (inherently) BIBO stable. The usefulness of the proposed technique is demonstrated through its application to the design of a sixth-order lowpass CRI Sigma-Delta D/A converter employing a 64 time oversampling ratio for a final realization incorporating 16-bit multiplier values

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207