Implications of a congenitally abnormal valve: a study of 1025 consecutively excised aortic valves
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of patients with congenitally abnormal aortic valves (AV) present for AV replacement. AIMS: To review morphological changes in a large contemporary patient population undergoing AV replacement. METHODS: A detailed review was conducted for all 1025 patients who underwent AV replacement from 2002 to 2005, including the clinical indication for surgery, the type of native AV disease, the pathological changes observed in each valve and the need for related surgery. RESULTS: Tricuspid (TAV), bicuspid (BAV) and unicuspid (UAV) aortic valves were observed in 64.5%, 31.9% and 3.0% of all patients respectively. A decreased number of cusps was associated with increasing predilection for male gender (83.9%, 73.4%, 59.2% for UAV, BAV, TAV respectively), a younger patient age at surgery (41.6 (14.3), 61.3 (12.8), 67.5 (12.9) years), and an increased occurrence of pathological changes in the cusps, including calcification of both the cusp and the base, ossification and ulceration. UAV and BAV were also associated with increasing replacement of the ascending aorta due to dilatation and aneurysm formation (54.8, 38.8%, 16.6%). The incidence of infective endocarditis and rheumatic heart disease was 3.8% and 11.2% of all excised valves respectively. CONCLUSION: UAV and BAV were increasingly likely to affect men, fail at an earlier age, and show an increasing incidence of pathological changes in the cusps and ascending aorta than TAV. These results suggest that TAV, BAV and UAV may represent a phenotypic continuum of a similar disease process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it