MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110987418 · doi:10.4161/cc.6.5.3923

XRCC3 Depletion Induces Spontaneous DNA Breaks and p53-Dependent Cell Death

2007· article· en· W2110987418 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Loignon, Lilian Amrein, Michael E. Dunn, Raquel Aloyz

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXRCC3BiologyCell cycleDNA repairHomologous recombinationDNA damageCell biologyDNA replicationGene knockdownProgrammed cell deathDNAMolecular biologyCellApoptosisGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vertebrate cells, Xrcc3 initiates the repair of exogenous induced-DNA breaks during S and G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle by homologous recombination. However, much less is known of the role of Xrcc3 in the response to spontaneous DNA breaks. Using a siRNA approach, we show that depletion of XRCC3 inhibits the proliferation of MCF7 breast cancer cells. This inhibition of replication coincides with the accumulation of DNA breaks, as shown by the comet assay. Cell cycle specific analysis of gammaH2AX expression shows that S and G2/M phase cells express the highest fraction of gammaH2AX positive cells. This is consistent with replication-dependent accumulation of DNA breaks and deficient homologous recombination. While the induction of gammaH2AX is followed by cell death in parental cells, a p53 knockdown derivative becomes more resistant to XRCC3 depletion-induced death without changes in the levels of gammaH2AX. These results show that XRCC3 is required for the proliferation of MCF7 cells, and that decrease in its expression leads to the accumulation of DNA breaks and the induction of p53-dependent cell death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207