Antigenic Diversity of <i>Haemophilus somnus</i> Lipooligosaccharide: Phase-Variable Accessibility of the Phosphorylcholine Epitope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of Haemophilus somnus undergoes antigenic phase variation, which may facilitate evasion from the bovine host immune response and/or colonization and dissemination. However, LOS antigenic diversity in H. somnus has not been adequately investigated. In this study, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to various LOS epitopes were used to investigate antigenic variation and stability in LOS from H. somnus strains and phase variants. Clinical isolates of H. somnus exhibited intrastrain, as well as interstrain, antigenic heterogeneity in LOS when probed with MAbs to outer core oligosaccharide epitopes in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, epitopes reactive with MAbs directed predominately to the inner core heptose region were highly conserved. At least one epitope, which was expressed in few strains, was identified. One LOS component affected by phase variation was identified as phosphorylcholine (PCho), which is linked to the primary glucose residue. Inhibition ELISA, immunoblotting, and electrospray-mass spectrometry were used to confirm that MAb 5F5.9 recognized PCho. LOS reactivity with MAb 5F5.9 was associated with loss of most of the outer core oligosaccharide, indicating that reactivity with PCho was affected by phase variation of the glucose residues in this region. Our results indicate that outer core epitopes of H. somnus LOS exhibit a high degree of random, phase-variable antigenic heterogeneity and that such heterogeneity must be considered in the design of vaccines and diagnostic tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".