Mode of Action: Reduction of Testosterone Availability—Molinate-Induced Inhibition of Spermatogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molinate is a preemergent herbicide that has been demonstrated to affect reproduction in the rat via alterations in sperm production. A wealth of standard toxicological studies and targeted research efforts relating to this adverse effect is available, and these were used to evaluate the utility of the Human Relevance Framework (HRF) for noncancer health effects. The hypothesized mode of action involved inhibition of the hydrolysis of cholesterol from high-density lipoprotein in the rat testes, followed by an androgen withdrawal syndrome on spermatogenesis. Some evidence is available that a similar mode of action would not be operable in humans. Despite the wealth of studies conducted in the rat, the weight of evidence is insufficient to define the mode of action for reproductive toxicity in the male rat. A principal deficiency in the database was discordance between the exposure levels observed to cause biochemical disturbances in the testes related to the hypothesized mode of action and the dose levels observed to induce the adverse outcome on spermatogenesis. For this reason, a complete MOA/human relevance analysis is not possible and, based on traditional risk assessment principles, any toxic effects are assumed to be relevant for human risk assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".