MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111040315 · doi:10.1080/10408440591007386

Mode of Action: Reduction of Testosterone Availability—Molinate-Induced Inhibition of Spermatogenesis

2005· review· en· W2111040315 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Robert J. Kavlock, Audrey M. Cummings

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Toxicology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth CanadaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsMode of actionSpermatogenesisReproductive toxicityToxicityTestosterone (patch)Adverse effectMechanism of actionBiologyEndocrinologyReproductionSpermInternal medicinePhysiologyPharmacologyToxicologyMedicineGeneticsIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molinate is a preemergent herbicide that has been demonstrated to affect reproduction in the rat via alterations in sperm production. A wealth of standard toxicological studies and targeted research efforts relating to this adverse effect is available, and these were used to evaluate the utility of the Human Relevance Framework (HRF) for noncancer health effects. The hypothesized mode of action involved inhibition of the hydrolysis of cholesterol from high-density lipoprotein in the rat testes, followed by an androgen withdrawal syndrome on spermatogenesis. Some evidence is available that a similar mode of action would not be operable in humans. Despite the wealth of studies conducted in the rat, the weight of evidence is insufficient to define the mode of action for reproductive toxicity in the male rat. A principal deficiency in the database was discordance between the exposure levels observed to cause biochemical disturbances in the testes related to the hypothesized mode of action and the dose levels observed to induce the adverse outcome on spermatogenesis. For this reason, a complete MOA/human relevance analysis is not possible and, based on traditional risk assessment principles, any toxic effects are assumed to be relevant for human risk assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in ToxicologySame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207