MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111094575 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egt077

A Record of Paleoproterozoic Subduction Preserved in the Northern Slave Cratonic Mantle: Sr–Pb–O Isotope and Trace-element Investigations of Eclogite Xenoliths from the Jericho and Muskox Kimberlites

2014· article· en· W2111094575 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katie A. Smart, Thomas Chacko, Antonio Simonetti, Z. D. Sharp, Larry M. Heaman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEclogiteGeologyXenolithGeochemistryKimberliteBasaltLithosphereMantle (geology)CratonSubductionTrace elementPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paleoproterozoic eclogite xenoliths from the Jericho and Muskox kimberlites located in the northern Slave craton, Canada, display geochemical and isotopic evidence of a recycled oceanic lithosphere origin. The eclogites comprise a diverse suite of kyanite- and diamond-bearing and bimineralic xenoliths that have a wide range of geochemical compositions. Calculated whole-rock eclogite compositions are broadly basaltic to picritic, ranging from 5 to 13 wt % MgO. Calculated whole-rock trace-element compositions for the eclogites show three overall REE patterns: the first pattern resembles that of oceanic gabbros with prominent positive Eu anomalies and flat heavy REE; the second pattern is similar to the first but displays marked light REE depletion that is interpreted to record partial melt loss; the third pattern lacks Eu anomalies and instead displays both gradually increasing REE contents from La to Lu similar to boninitic melts and 'humped' middle REE patterns similar to those observed in eclogites formed by reaction with subduction fluids. Several eclogites have garnet and/or clinopyroxene δ18O values >6‰, which coupled with the trace-element systematics of all the eclogites is interpreted to reflect derivation from recycled oceanic lithosphere protoliths. Lead isotope data for eclogite clinopyroxenes form a broad array that extends from highly radiogenic isotope compositions similar to the host Jericho kimberlite to an intersection with the Stacey–Kramers terrestrial two-stage Pb evolution curve at c. 2·2 Ga. The slope of this data array defines a secondary Pb isochron with an associated age of 1·7 ± 0·3 Ga. Although it is possible that the Pb isotope array is actually a mixing line between the eclogite protolith and the host Jericho kimberlite, both the secondary isochron age and the c. 2·2 Ga Stacey–Kramers model age are consistent with Paleoproterozoic protolith oceanic crust formation. Eclogite xenoliths and eclogitic diamond inclusions from the Slave craton almost exclusively yield c. 2 Ga ages, which are broadly compatible with formation during subduction associated with the c. 1·9–1·8 Ga Wopmay orogeny at the western margin of the Slave craton. Trends in the Sr–Pb isotopic compositions of the eclogite clinopyroxene show that seawater alteration of the oceanic crust protoliths was an important process during protolith formation, and cryptic metasomatism further increased the Pb and Sr isotope values. This metasomatism is probably associated with the Jurassic kimberlite magmatism; however, contributions from the Mesoproterozoic Mackenzie event cannot be completely excluded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207