MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111123263 · doi:10.1177/0004867414557679

The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement: Exacerbation of inequality for patients with serious mental illness

2014· editorial· en· W2111123263 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erik Monasterio, Deborah Gleeson

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisadvantagedNegotiationGeneral partnershipIndigenousTreatyPopulationMental healthPolitical scienceEconomic growthDevelopment economicsMedicineEnvironmental healthEconomicsLawPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Negotiations for a treaty that is set to become one of the world’s biggest trade agreements, the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), have sparked considerable concern and debate about the possible impacts on health. The TPPA negotiations involve a diverse set of 12 countries from around the Pacific Rim. These include developed countries such as Australia, New Zealand, the United States and Canada, along with much lower-income countries such as Vietnam and Peru.While few details about the nego-tiations are publicly available, the TPPA is said to comprise approxi-mately 29 chapters, which include legal rules covering issues such as investor protections, intellectual property rules and regulatory coher-ence along with more traditional trade issues such as the removal of tariffs. A number of recent reviews based on leaked negotiating docu-ments conclude that there are legiti-mate concerns about the potential impact of the TPPA in relation to ensuring equitable access to medi-cines and public health regulation, including tobacco, food and alcohol regulation (see, for example, Hirono et al., 2014; Wyber and Perry, 2013).While many of the health-related impacts of the TPPA can be expected to be population-wide, many of the impacts will be differentially distrib-uted. People in low-income countries and disadvantaged groups within par-ticipant countries, including those of low socioeconomic status, Indigenous people and those with chronic ill-nesses and disabilities, are likely to be disproportionately affected (Gleeson et al., 2013; Hirono et al., 2014).The purpose of this article is to consider the likely implications of the TPPA on access to health care and public health initiatives (proposed and actual) to improve the health and lifes-pan of patients suffering from serious mental illness (SMI). SMI includes schizophrenia and related disorders, bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, neurotic disorder and substance use disorder. One of the most consist-ently replicated findings in the social sciences has been the negative rela-tionship of socioeconomic status and SMI, indicating that people with SMI face higher levels of disadvantage com-pared to most other groups in the community (Muntaner et al., 2004).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.019
Research integrity0.0040.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian & New Zealand Journal of PsychiatrySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207