MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111168629

Narrow linewidth 1.52 µm InAs/InP quantum dot DFB lasers

2011· article· en· W2111168629 on OpenAlexaff
Philip J. Poole, Zhenguo Lü, J.R. Liu, Pedro Barrios, Zhejing Jiao, Daniel Poitras, A. J. SpringThorpe, G. Pakulski, D. Goodchild, B. Rioux

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser linewidthMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsLasing thresholdLaserQuantum dotChemical vapor depositionQuantum dot laserRelative intensity noiseCladding (metalworking)Molecular beam epitaxyContinuous waveOpticsSemiconductor laser theoryWavelengthMetalorganic vapour phase epitaxyPhotoluminescenceGratingEpitaxySemiconductorNanotechnologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have grown, fabricated, and tested single mode ridge-waveguide distributed feedback lasers utilising InAs/InP quantum dots as the gain medium. The growth of quantum dots on InP substrates allows us to reach the important 1.55 µm telecommunications wavelength range, in this case lasing at 1.52 µm. The quantum dot gain medium was grown using chemical beam epitaxy, and the top cladding regrown after grating patterning using metal-organic-chemical vapour-deposition. No shift in the photoluminescence peak wavelength of the dots was observed following top cladding regrowth. Ridge waveguide lasers were fabricated with ridge widths of 3 µm and cleaved to 500 µm and 1 mm cavity lengths. The facets were coated to provide reflectivities of 65% and 2%. In continuous wave (cw) operation single-mode output was observed with a side mode suppression ratio greater than 61 dB, and an output power of 9.7 mW at an injection current of 150 mA. Operation up to 80°C was achieved. The relative intensity noise was measured to be less than −154 dB/Hz from 10 MHz to 10 GHz, and the optical linewidth to be less than 150 KHz for the best devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related MaterialsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207