MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111202336 · doi:10.1051/medsci/200723111002

La cirrhose amérindienne infantile

2007· article· fr· W2111202336 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andréa Richter, Grant A. Mitchell, Andrée Rasquin

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesGynecologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

North American Indian childhood cirrhosis is a distinct form of neonatal familial cholestasis. To date, it has only been described in aboriginal children from northwestern Quebec. The disease rapidly evolves into cirrhosis with early portal hypertension and bleeding from esophageal varices. Twelve of 36 children followed at l'Hôpital Ste-Justine since 1970 received a liver transplant. As of now, there are 17 living NAIC patients, 6 of whom had liver transplantation. We mapped NAIC to chromosome 16q22, and identified mutations in CIRH1A in patients. All are homozygous for the R565W mutation in cirhin, a WD40 repeat protein of unknown function. We showed that cirhin is a resident in the nucleolus. Cirhin interacts with Cirip, a functional, alternative splice variant of the HIVEP1 protein. Their interaction indicates synergistic action. The complete inactivation of mouse homolog, tex292 is likely embryonic lethal. The continued collaboration between patients, their families, clinicians and researchers that has helped to identify the disease gene and to develop a diagnostic test now focuses on finding a new treatment for this unique disease affecting First Nations children from Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207