Wavelet transform coherence based investigation of existence of relationship between the cardiovascular and postural control systems during orthostatic challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have established the effects of orthostatic challenge on the cardiovascular and postural control systems, but the interdependent behavior of the systems under such condition is unclear. In the present study we examined the simultaneous changes in posture muscle electromyography (EMG) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during quiet standing in healthy young individuals. Photoplethysmography based SBP, surface EMG, electrocardiogram (Lead II ECG) and posturography data were acquired during the experiment. Wavelet transform coherence (WTC) analysis was applied to identify the zones of interdependent behavior of the systems. The WTC thresholds were identified for the specific data under investigation. The coherence was analyzed in three frequency bands namely, LF (0.05 - 0.1 Hz), VLF (0.01-0.05 Hz) and ULF (0.005 - 0.01 Hz). WTC estimates for the EMG - SBP comparison showed greater than threshold values in all three frequency bands (LF: 0.31 ± 0.02; VLF: 0.41 ± 0.01; ULF: 0.45 ± 0.01). In conclusion this study showed the existence of relationship between the posture muscle EMG and blood pressure during natural orthostatic stress, by validation based on wavelet transform coherence. Further validation is required to objectively characterize this relationship between the two systems during orthostatic stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".