Sodium chlorite – iodide – acetylacetone oscillation reaction investigated by UV-Vis spectrophotometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new sodium chlorite – iodide – acetylacetone chemical oscillatory reaction has been studied by the UV-Vis spectrophotometric method. The initial concentrations of acetylacetone, sodium chlorite, iodide, and sulfuric acid and the pH value have great influence on the oscillation observed at a wavelength of 570 nm for the starch–triiodide complex. There is a pre-oscillatory or induction stage and the amplitude and number of oscillations depend on the initial concentration of the reactants. Equations for the starch–triiodide complex reaction rate change with reaction time and the initial concentrations in the oscillation stage were obtained. The induction time decreases linearly with the initial concentration of acetylacetone or sodium chlorite but increases linearly with the initial concentration of sulfuric acid. The oscillation reaction can be accelerated by increasing the reaction temperature. The apparent activation energies at the induction stage and the oscillation stage were 61.02 and 61.36 kJ/mol, respectively, indicating that the two stages have similar reaction mechanisms. Generating the enol isomer by keto–enol tautomerism is an important step to constrain the time of the induction period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".