Numerically Modeled Dynamic Response of Perfect and Leaky Dielectric Droplets in an Electric Field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary form only given. A dielectric liquid droplet in an immiscible dielectric medium will deform when subjected to an external electric field. This effect is a component of the motion seen in electrically actuated droplets in a lab-on-a-chip setting, and is being studied in order to provide a basis for modeling electrowetting actuation behaviour. It is, however, a widely studied phenomenon in its own right, and can be employed in various emulsion technologies. The present work is a finite element analysis of both the perfect and leaky dielectric models, taking into account the time dependence of the deformation and the nonlinearity encountered when the deformation becomes large. In order to assess the accuracy of the model, comparisons are made with the classical small-deformation analytic results and with recent finite element results. The effects of the fluid properties and the applied field on the transient response and the resulting deformation are observed, and the transient response in particular is analyzed in order to provide a basis for dynamic control of the system. This could lead to a strategy for reliably controlling the behaviour of droplets under electrowetting actuation on a microfluidic chip.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".