Intravascular Kinetics of C-Reactive Protein and Their Relationships with Features of the Metabolic Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe, for the first time, the intravascular kinetics of C-reactive protein (CRP), using stable isotopes, and its relationship with features of the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Sixteen men and 16 women [aged 49 +/- 9 years, body mass index (BMI) 28.7 +/- 4.5 kg/m(2)] underwent a 12-h primed-constant infusion of 5,5,5-(2)H(3)-l-leucine. CRP was purified from the plasma fraction rho greater than 1.25 g/ml by affinity chromatography, and isotopic enrichment over time was determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The CRP fractional catabolic rate was 60% higher in men than women (0.49 +/- 1.83 vs. 0.30 +/- 1.80 pool/d, P = 0.03), but this difference was no longer significant in a multivariate model that included several features associated with the metabolic syndrome. The CRP production rate (PR) and pool size were not statistically different between sexes. Plasma CRP concentrations were more strongly correlated with the PR (r = 0.80, P < 0.0001) than with the fractional catabolic rate of CRP (r = 0.39, P < 0.05). The PR of CRP was positively correlated with waist girth (r = 0.53, P < 0.01), plasma low-density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B-100 (r = 0.42, P = 0.07), triglyceride (r = 0.41, P = 0.06), and IL-6 concentrations (r = 0.61, P = 0.0008) and inversely correlated with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (r = -0.47, P = 0.03) and adiponectin (r = -0.63, P < 0.0005) after adjustment for sex. Blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol showed no association with CRP kinetics. CONCLUSION: The PR of CRP appeared as the main determinant of CRP concentrations and showed significant associations with features of the metabolic syndrome as well as with adipose tissue-derived cytokines such as IL-6 and adiponectin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".