MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111475510 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v1n1p31

Synthesis, Characterization and Application of O, O-diethyl Acrylamide Phosphate

2009· article· en· W2111475510 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aibing Jiang, Bowen Cheng, Yuanlin Ren, Zhenhuan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFlame retardant materials and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAcrylamideLimiting oxygen indexFire retardantTriethylamineIntumescentCopolymerPolymer chemistryFourier transform infrared spectroscopyYield (engineering)Mass fractionResidue (chemistry)NitrogenPhosphonateNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking acrylamide and diethyl chlorophosphate as the reactants, we synthesized a sort of new intumescent flame retardant(IFR) containing phosphorus and nitrogen, O,O-diethyl acrylamide phosphonate. The structure of the title compoundcould be characterized by FTIR, 1H NMR and MS. The results show that the structure of the synthesized compound isconsistent with the expected structure. The yield of the title compound is 75% under the conditions that the molar ratiobetween acid-binding agents of triethylamine and acrylamide is 1:1 and the mass fraction of the catalys CuCl is 1% ofacrylamide. The optimal reaction temperature range is from 20 centi degree to 30 centi degree. The limiting oxygen index (LOI) value canreach 26.7% when the mass fraction of the title compound in the copolymer is 20%. The scanning electron microscopy(SEM) photos of the fired residue of the flame retarded copolymer show that the surface of the fired residue presentsfoam-like structure, and the cross section presents cellular structure, which indicate that the title compound is theintumescent flame retardant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicFlame retardant materials and propertiesFrench-language works237,207