MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111574921 · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0555

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer—A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

2010· article· en· W2111574921 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineDyslipidemiaOdds ratioCancerBody mass indexConfidence intervalDiabetes mellitusInternal medicinePopulationMetabolic syndromeRisk factorPediatricsDiseaseObesityEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease compared with the general population. METHODS: Eight thousand five hundred ninety-nine survivors (52% male) and 2,936 siblings (46% male) from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, a retrospectively ascertained, prospectively followed study of persons who survived 5 years after childhood cancer diagnosed from 1970 to 1986, were evaluated for body mass index of > or =30 kg/m(2) based on self-reported heights and weights and self-reported use of medications for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose metabolism. The presence of three or more of the above constituted Cardiovascular Risk Factor Cluster (CVRFC), a surrogate for Metabolic Syndrome. RESULTS: Survivors were more likely than siblings to take medications for hypertension [odds ratio (OR), 1.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.6-2.2], dyslipidemia (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0) or diabetes (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3). Among these young adults (mean age of 32 years for survivors and 33 years for siblings), survivors were not more likely than siblings to be obese or have CVRFC. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors associated with having CVRFC included older age at interview [> or =40 versus <30 years of age (OR, 8.2; 95% CI, 3.5-19.9)], exposure to total body irradiation (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.5-15.8) or radiation to the chest and abdomen (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4), and physical inactivity (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Among adult survivors of pediatric cancer, older attained age, exposure to total body irradiation or abdominal plus chest radiation, and a sedentary life-style are associated with CVRFC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it