The RING Domain of cIAP1 Mediates the Degradation of RING-bearing Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins by Distinct Pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Inhibitor of Apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are key repressors of apoptosis. Several IAP proteins contain a RING domain that functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Here we investigated the interplay of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and RING-mediated IAP turnover. We found that the CARD-RING domain of cIAP1 (cIAP1-CR) is capable of down-regulating protein levels of RING-bearing IAPs such as cIAP1, cIAP2, XIAP, and Livin, while sparing NAIP and Survivin, which do not possess a RING domain. To determine whether polyubiquitination was required, we tested the ability of cIAP1-CR to degrade IAPs under conditions that impair ubiquitination modifications. Remarkably, although the ablation of E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme prevented cIAP1-CR-mediated down-regulation of cIAP1 and cIAP2, there was no impact on degradation of XIAP and Livin. XIAP mutants that were not ubiquitinated in vivo were readily down-regulated by cIAP1-CR. Moreover, XIAP degradation in response to cisplatin and doxorubicin was largely prevented in cIAP1-silenced cells, despite cIAP2 up-regulation. The knockdown of cIAP1 and cIAP2 partially blunted Fas ligand-mediated down-regulation of XIAP and protected cells from cell death. Together, these results show that the E3 ligase RING domain of cIAP1 targets RING-bearing IAPs for proteasomal degradation by ubiquitin-dependent and -independent pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".