MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111604176 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.4219

Transcriptional Control of Murine <i>CD94</i> Gene: Differential Usage of Dual Promoters by Lymphoid Cell Types

2003· article· en· W2111604176 on OpenAlexafffund
Brian T. Wilhelm, Josette‐Renée Landry, Fumio Takei, Dixie L. Mager

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersBC Cancer AgencyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsPromoterDual (grammatical number)Differential (mechanical device)GeneBiologyCell biologyComputational biologyGeneticsGene expressionPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CD94 gene product is involved in controlling NK cell activation, and is one of a family of immune receptors that is found in the NK gene complex in both humans and mice, adjacent to members of the NKG2 family. CD94 forms a heterodimeric complex with several members of the NKG2 family on the surface of NK, T, and NKT cells. These complexes recognize the nonclassical MHC class I molecules HLA-E and Qa-1(b) in humans and mice, respectively. The mechanism for cell type-specific expression of CD94 and other genes from the NK gene complex has not yet been elucidated. In the current study, we show that the murine CD94 gene has two promoters, one of which is upstream of a previously unidentified exon. We illustrate by quantitative real-time PCR that lymphoid cell types use these two promoters differentially and that the promoter usage seen in adult cells is already established during fetal development. We determined that the differential promoter usage by NK cells appears to be susceptible to perturbation, as both the murine NK cell line LNK, as well as cultured C57BL/6 NK cells showed altered promoter usage relative to fresh NK cells. Furthermore, the promoter activity observed in transfection assays did not correlate with expression of the endogenous CD94 gene, suggesting the involvement of chromatin structure/methylation in transcriptional regulation. Our detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites at the CD94 locus that are present only in a cell line expressing endogenous CD94 supports this hypothesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207