MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111643434 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.842180

A fast recursive total least squares algorithm for adaptive IIR filtering

2005· article· en· W2111643434 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmComputational complexity theoryRecursive least squares filterRamer–Douglas–Peucker algorithmRayleigh quotientMathematicsAdaptive filterLeast-squares function approximationInfinite impulse responseKalman filterRayleigh quotient iterationComputer scienceComputationMathematical optimizationIterative methodFilter (signal processing)Digital filterPower iterationEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work develops a new fast recursive total least squares (N-RTLS) algorithm to recursively compute the total least squares (TLS) solution for adaptive infinite-impulse-response (IIR) filtering. The new algorithm is based on the minimization of the constraint Rayleigh quotient in which the first entry of the parameter vector is fixed to the negative one. The highly computational efficiency of the proposed algorithm depends on the efficient computation of the gain vector and the adaptation of the Rayleigh quotient. Using the shift structure of the input data vectors, a fast algorithm for computing the gain vector is established, which is referred to as the fast gain vector (FGV) algorithm. The computational load of the FGV algorithm is smaller than that of the fast Kalman algorithm. Moreover, the new algorithm is numerically stable since it does not use the well-known matrix inversion lemma. The computational complexity of the new algorithm per iteration is also O(L). The global convergence of the new algorithm is studied. The performances of the relevant algorithms are compared via simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it