A Demonstration of the Application of Quantized Spatial Transforms in the Scaled and Optimized Separation of Scalar Potential Source Contributions for Use in Education, Research and Resource Exploration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An approach to the inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) isolation and identification of geological source contributions to surface gravitational and magnetic attractions is demonstrated. The techniques were developed from considerations of the scaling and linearity of the continuous Fourier transform and the properties of the classical potential fields. The approach exploits the characteristics of the discrete vertical spectral components of the FFT and their equivalent IFFT representations. The results depend upon absolute and relative quantitative comparisons over scaled regions represented within the digitized transform of the grid-based surface interpolated from the original field measurements. They provide for quantified estimates of parameters related to equivalent source contributions to anomalies identified within the surface. The techniques can be optimized with respect to the goals and resources associated with a particular investigation. Anomalies within FFT/IFFT filtered spatial residuals from a transformed digital surface are defined in terms of localized reference levels over scaled central sub-regions of a surveyed area. Iterative methods lead to particular subsets of the discrete depth components viewed over scaled spatial regions which contribute to identifiable features. Such identification can yield information related to the physical properties of sources responsible for regional and localized anomalies. The depth, spatial extent, and density or magnetization associated with these contributions can be estimated directly from the scaled views. These methods can be applied with predictable accuracy over orders of magnitude in physical scale. The quantitative information derived from the techniques provides for a scaled reduction in the ambiguity associated with any subsequent interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".