MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111699173 · doi:10.5539/esr.v3n2p1

A Demonstration of the Application of Quantized Spatial Transforms in the Scaled and Optimized Separation of Scalar Potential Source Contributions for Use in Education, Research and Resource Exploration

2014· article· en· W2111699173 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A.M. McDermott, Jeffrey R. Chiarenzelli

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFast Fourier transformFourier transformScalingScalar (mathematics)Computer scienceAlgorithmSpatial analysisGridDiscrete Fourier transform (general)MathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisFractional Fourier transformFourier analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach to the inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) isolation and identification of geological source contributions to surface gravitational and magnetic attractions is demonstrated. The techniques were developed from considerations of the scaling and linearity of the continuous Fourier transform and the properties of the classical potential fields. The approach exploits the characteristics of the discrete vertical spectral components of the FFT and their equivalent IFFT representations. The results depend upon absolute and relative quantitative comparisons over scaled regions represented within the digitized transform of the grid-based surface interpolated from the original field measurements. They provide for quantified estimates of parameters related to equivalent source contributions to anomalies identified within the surface. The techniques can be optimized with respect to the goals and resources associated with a particular investigation. Anomalies within FFT/IFFT filtered spatial residuals from a transformed digital surface are defined in terms of localized reference levels over scaled central sub-regions of a surveyed area. Iterative methods lead to particular subsets of the discrete depth components viewed over scaled spatial regions which contribute to identifiable features. Such identification can yield information related to the physical properties of sources responsible for regional and localized anomalies. The depth, spatial extent, and density or magnetization associated with these contributions can be estimated directly from the scaled views. These methods can be applied with predictable accuracy over orders of magnitude in physical scale. The quantitative information derived from the techniques provides for a scaled reduction in the ambiguity associated with any subsequent interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth Science ResearchSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207