Vascular response of the meniscus to injury: Effects of immobilization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Failed meniscal healing may lead to degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee. Healing is thought to be dependent upon an adequate blood supply, yet "normal" vascular changes during healing are not well understood. In this study we have quantified vasoactive and angiogenic responses to medial meniscal injury in a rabbit model under clinically relevant conditions, and related these to histological criteria of healing. Twenty-six adult rabbits were given a standardized meniscal injury; 12 of these had the hind limb immobilized by pinning. Eight normal controls and 12 sham-operated animals were also studied. After 4 weeks, animals underwent either vascular volume (vascular index) determination, or blood flow measurement using coloured microspheres. Histological analysis was also performed to assess meniscal healing. In injured animals, blood flow to the menisci was increased fivefold 4 weeks post-operative; this increase was prevented by immobilization. The vascular index of the menisci was also increased threefold by injury, but not significantly reduced by immobilization. Histological examination of injured menisci showed examples of healing and non-healing tears in both mobile and immobile groups. Meniscal injuries are associated with characteristic changes in vascularity and perfusion, and these changes likely play a significant role in the healing process. Characterization of the vascular responses to meniscal injury may lead to techniques that can promote reliable healing of meniscal tears and thereby improve clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".